Free Astrology Charts

The positions are calculated from published astronomical data. Anything interpretive is presented as tradition, clearly separated from the maths.

Tools in this category

1 tool

An accurate chart, and an honest label on the reading

A birth chart has two halves and almost nobody separates them. The first half is a set of positions: where the sun, the moon and the planets stood at a particular moment, seen from a particular place on the earth. That is measurable, checkable, and identical in every ephemeris ever printed. The second half is what a tradition reads into those positions, and that is a body of interpretation with a long history and no evidence behind it.

These tools compute the first half properly and label the second half plainly. You get the real chart, drawn the way you are used to reading it, and you get what the tradition says about it presented as what a tradition says.

Why the positions are computed rather than generated

Ask a language model where Saturn was in 1985 and it will tell you, fluently and wrongly, and the reading built on that answer will look exactly like a correct one. There is nothing in the output that gives it away. So on these pages no model is ever asked an astronomical question. The chart is computed first, in full, and only then handed to anything that writes prose about it.

One tradition at a time

A Vedic reading here uses nakshatras, the navamsa and the classical Parashari method, and does not borrow sun-sign personality writing or the modern planets. A Ptolemaic reading follows the Hellenistic tradition and does not borrow Sanskrit terms it has no use for. If you want to see the difference, run the same birth through both: with the zodiacs currently about twenty four degrees apart, most people find their sun in a different sign.

The birth time is the part people get wrong

Signs are slow and the ascendant is fast. The sun spends a month in a sign, so a sun sign survives quite a lot of uncertainty about the hour. The ascendant travels the whole zodiac in a day, which is a sign roughly every two hours, and it is what fixes the houses that every other placement is then read through. So a chart drawn from a remembered approximate time has correct signs and unreliable houses, and it is worth knowing which half of your reading rests on which. If the time on the birth certificate and the time in the family story disagree, that gap is usually larger than anything else in the chart.

What these tools will not do

They will not predict a death, name an illness, or tell you what to do with money. Those are excluded deliberately rather than left to the phrasing of the moment, because a confident sentence about any of them can do real damage. They also do not produce compatibility percentages, which look like measurements and are not.

Questions people ask

Are the planet positions here real?

Yes. Every position on these pages is computed from an astronomical library, the same way an ephemeris does it, and you can check any of them against one. Where a planet stood at a given moment is a fact about the solar system. That part of these tools is astronomy and nothing else.

So is the astrology real?

That is a separate question and these pages keep it separate. There is no evidence that the positions of the planets at a birth determine anything about the life that follows, and every reading here says so underneath. What the pages offer is an accurate chart and an honest account of what a named tradition makes of it.

Why does the tradition have to be chosen?

Because they are different systems, not different flavours of one. Vedic astrology uses the sidereal zodiac, tied to the fixed stars. Western astrology after Ptolemy uses the tropical zodiac, tied to the spring equinox. The two have drifted about twenty four degrees apart, which is most of a sign, so the same birth genuinely reads differently in each. Blending them, which a lot of free readings quietly do, produces something that belongs to neither.

Why is the birth time asked for every time?

Because the ascendant, the point of the zodiac rising in the east, moves a full sign roughly every two hours, and it decides which house each planet falls in. A chart without a birth time still has correct sign positions, but its houses are guesswork. Any tool here that needs the time says what is lost when you do not have it.

Do you handle historical time zones?

Yes, and it is worth knowing why it matters. An offset belongs to a date, not to a place. Sri Lanka moved from five and a half hours ahead to six and a half in 1996, to six, and back again in 2006. India had a Calcutta time distinct from the rest of the country until 1948. Apply today's offset to a birth in 1985 and the chart shifts by half an hour, which is enough to move the ascendant, and nothing about the result would look wrong.

Is there an account, or a paid full reading?

No to both, and the second one is the usual business model in this subject: a free chart, then a charge to find out what it means. Everything here is free permanently, with no account and no held-back section.